Skip to main content
Bioptimus models are evaluated on independent, peer-reviewed benchmarks. The two most relevant for pathology foundation models are PathBench (HKUST) and HEST (Harvard; Jaume et al. 2025).

PathBench

PathBench is a multi-task, multi-organ benchmark for pathology foundation models. Bioptimus reports H-Optimus-1 as the top-ranked model on the overall rank score (lower is better).
ModelOverall rank score
H-Optimus-16.06
Virchow26.34
H-Optimus-06.86
UNI27.10
mSTAR7.65
Rankings are task- and organ-dependent. H-Optimus-1 ranks first overall and leads on several organs (e.g. lung and colorectal); other models lead on specific tasks. Always link to the source so readers can see the full picture.Sources: PathBench paper (arXiv:2505.20202) · bioptimus.com

HEST

HEST (Harvard; Jaume et al. 2025) measures how well a model predicts gene expression from histology across nine organs. The metric is Pearson’s correlation coefficient (higher is better). As of May 2026, H-Optimus-1 is the top-ranked image-only model on HEST, and M-Optimus-1 surpasses it by adding multimodal training.
ModelHEST (avg. Pearson r)
M-Optimus-10.440
H-Optimus-10.423
Figures are reported in the M-Optimus-1 report (M-Optimus-1 vs. H-Optimus-1 on HEST). The full per-model HEST leaderboard is maintained by the HEST authors — see the source for the complete table and methodology.

H-Optimus-1 launch note (HEST details)

Bioptimus’s write-up of the HEST evaluation and methodology.

At scale

  • 100+ papers published using Bioptimus models
  • Used by 16 of the top 20 pharma companies
  • 1,000+ clinical practices · 1M+ total model downloads

Research & publications

Peer-reviewed work and case studies in the Bioptimus Knowledge Base.